How to avoid excessive tax on medical payments

The South African Revenue Service recently published a draft Interpretation Note relating to the taxation of medical lump sums. Employers often provide various incentives to attract and retain employees with scarce skills. One form of benefit is to cover the medical aid contributions of former employees in retirement. This could be an expensive and risky exercise for a taxpayer as medical inflation may exceed general inflation, or a former employee’s chronic illness can be protracted.

 In order to counter such a risk, taxpayers may seek to settle this liability upfront. Two common approaches to settling liabilities upfront are:

  • to make a lumpsum payment to an insurer for a policy of insurance; or
  • to make a direct lump-sum payment to the former employee or dependant.

Depending on the facts, the taxpayer may shift their contractual responsibility to provide post-retirement medical benefits to the insurer, former employee, or dependant. Previously, the tax treatment of a lump sum paid by a taxpayer to cancel the obligation to provide for the post-retirement medical benefits of a former employee was uncertain and arguably not deductible. Since the introduction of section 12M, a taxpayer can claim an immediate deduction of a lump sum payment made for purposes of covering the post-retirement medical aid contributions of a specified former employee or dependent.

A deduction under section 12M will be available if the lump sum is paid by the taxpayer during the taxpayer’s year of assessment in the course of the taxpayer’s trade to:

  • any former employee who retired from the taxpayer’s employment on the grounds of old age, ill-health or infirmity or any dependant of such former employee, or
  • to an insurer under a policy of insurance taken out solely in respect of one or more of the above-mentioned former employees or their dependants.

Importantly, the purpose of making the lump sum payment is to enable the former employee or their dependants to make a contribution to a specified medical scheme or a specified medical scheme fund.

The deduction is limited to the extent that the lump sum payment is for the purpose of making a contribution to a specified medical scheme or medical scheme fund in respect of the above-mentioned former employee or dependant.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied upon as professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your financial adviser for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)


Posted

in

by

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies
X

IC Marais

Professional experience:

IC Marais is a certified CA (SA) with public sector and private sector technical knowledge based on 5 years’ Public Sector accounting, auditing and financial management experience and 5 years audit, tax and accounting experience. Detailed knowledge of private and public sector accounting and auditing standards (GRAP, IPSAS, IFRS, IAS, ISA) and public sector financial legislation (MFMA, etc.)

He enjoys the outdoors, hunting and fishing.

ic@newtons-sa.co.za

SCHALK GOUWS

Professional experience:

In 1995, Schalk started as a trainee at Warner and Newton (which became Moores Rowland in 1997 and then Mazars Moores Rowland in 2007) in Bloemfontein. In 1998, Schalk was appointed as manager at Moores Rowland, where he became a partner in 2003. Schalk received his Postgraduate Certificate in Advanced Taxation in 2006 and in 2009 he received his Certificate in the Administration of Estates.

schalk@newtons-sa.co.za

CEDRIC PETERSON

Professional experience:

Cedric started as a trainee at Warner and Newton (which became Moores Rowland in 1997 and Mazars Moores Rowland in 2007), Bloemfontein, in 1986. After completion of his articles, he joined the Special Investigations Division of the Department of Finance (SA Revenue Services) as a senior inspector from 1990 to 1991.

cedric@newtons-sa.co.za

LUCHA GREYLING

Professional experience:

Lucha started her career as a tax inspector at the Inland Revenue Department of New Zealand. After this she worked in commerce in Canada, Mexico and the United States.

On her return to South Africa, she completed her CA training contract with us and has been with Newtons ever since. She became a Partner in 2012.

Apart from her CA(SA) qualification she also holds a postgraduate certificate in Advanced Taxation (2005) and has the overall responsibility for training as our Training Officer.

lucha@newtons-sa.co.za